Back in December, 2014, I reported in Pharma Marketing News that the FDA was planning to study "Spousal Influence On Consumer Understanding Of And Response To Direct-To-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements" (see "Does Your Spouse Influence Your DTC Viewing Experience?").
At about the same time, the new ad for Viagra, which featured a sexy woman (no man), aired on TV (read "Oh Yeah, Baby! Show Me More!... Viagra TV Ads Like This. But Don't Let My FDA See It!").
Of course, I thought the FDA should study how wives (or significant other spousal equivalents) might influence their spouses' (i.e., husbands') response to THAT ad.
But, no, the FDA will be using asthma drug ads in their study. Huh?!
It appears that the FDA is using a benign drug category to get results that it may use against Viagra and other male/female enhancement drug ads. AbbVie and Eli Lilly -- two marketers of lifestyle-enhancing drugs for men -- recognize this ploy and have submitted comments to the FDA in an attempt to shoot down the study.
What's their beef?
Read more »
No comments:
Post a Comment